I would like to expand upon a concept mentioned by
Menachem Leibtag in his internet shiur on Parashat Pinechas. He raised
the question as to the positioning of a number of elements in the
parasha relating to the conquering of the land. He answered that after
the plagues had come to an end, it was now appropriate to count the
people and proceed to divide the land and fight battles.
I would like to take this theory one step further,
which will reveal the key role of Pinechas in the whole history of the
Jewish people and should help us appreciate Parshiot Matot Masaei a bit
more, too. Before doing so, I would like to pose a number of questions,
some of which are addressed in Menachem’s shiur. 1) In G-d’s words
to Moshe about Pinechas, He says "I did not wipe out (ve-lo
chiliti) the Jews in my vengeance." When did G-d say that He
had intended to wipe out the Jews? 2) Why the grand terms in these
promises to Pinechas, "a covenant of peace" and "a
covenant of priesthood forever"? 3) What does it mean that Pinechas
"atoned" for Israel? 4) Why does the Torah repeat that
"and it was after the plague" (26, 1)? It already said at the
end of Balak, "The plague ceased from the Children of Israel."
To answer these questions we need to go back to an
earlier stage in the book of Bemidbar. At the outset of the book there
was communication between G-d and Moshe, as Moshe complains of the harsh
conditions of his job (ch. 9). The masses communicated with Moshe (ch.
11) when they had a problem regarding the Paschal offering. As the book
progresses, communication breaks down. Moshe was able to hold off the
wrath of G-d after Miriam episode, after the spy incident, and during
the Korach rebellion. Note that after the spy episode, G-d wished to
inflict the Jews with one of the Egyptian plague, that of pestilence,
dever (14, 12). During the Korach rebellion, G-d threatened to utterly
destroy the people in a moment ("va-achaleh otam ke-raga,"
16, 22). These challenges were easily overcome by a skillful Moshe.
This is the point at which a major shift takes place
in this book. After the Korach rebellion was put out with great fanfare,
the Jews complain yet again (that Moshe is killing the people of G-d!).
This is met with a demand by G-d to which Moshe cannot respond. Here
again G-d threatens to wipe out the Jews with almost the identical
expressions ("va-achaleh otam ke-raga," 17, 10). Yet
this time Moses responds in a bizarre fashion. He comes up with his own
solution to circumvent the plague. He tells Aharon to use incense to
atone for the sin. As this notion comes out of nowhere, it is not surprising
that the Talmud and Rashi believe Moshe got that idea from his stint in
heaven. No one on earth could have such a solution.
In other words, there is no logical response to G-d
now. Perhaps logically G-d should simply destroy the people now. They
have frustrated every attempt to reform themselves.
In Parashat Chukat, Moshe, Aharon, and Miriam are now
decreed to die. The slightest sin is grounds for death. There is no
contesting the verdict. In this Parasha, the people’s complaining
about the man lead to G-d unleashing the serpents on the people. After
the people repent, G-d does suggest a solution. G-d will not cease to
unleash the serpents on the masses, but if they look up to the copper
serpent, then they will be healed. It is guilty unless proven innocent.
Mind you, G-d had promised to take this new generation to Israel, and
that would have happened. G-d will not tolerate random cursing of the
Jews, but the continuing plagues do threaten to destroy the people.
What I am claiming is that to this point, G-d has
still not rescinded His decree to wipe out the Jewish people. Yes, Moshe
had atoned for them with a ritualistic incense. Yes, the people could be
saved from snakes by looking at the copper one, but the status quo at
this point is that the people are to be destroyed. There may be pauses
in the destructive plagues, but the desire to destroy us had not been
addressed.
Obviously, with this background in mind, when the Jews
now stooped to the level of the golden calf, worshipping the Peor and
engaging in rampant and flagrant immorality, the chances for the
continuation of the Jewish people as we know it were not good. That is
why Moshe is not to be blamed for falling on his face in response to
this. There is nothing to be done. All is lost. Once again, only an off
the books, one time effort can save the day- Pinechas’ zealotry. At
that point, G-d’s wrath is appeased, and a new covenant has dawned, no
less significant than that of Noah in his day. From now on, there is a
clean slate. Someone cares deeply about the shame of G-d and did
something about it (Pinechas, see Shem Mishmuel). G-d is ready to
atone.
Now we can answer our previous questions. 1) Where
does it say that G-d had planned to wipe out the Jews? Answer: This goes
back to Korach. G-d had never been successfully dissuaded not to utterly
destroy them. 2-3) The grandiose language employed regarding Pinchas’
achievement reflect the truth that a whole new covenant has been
established. G-d will no longer destroy the Jews with his vengeance. In
fact, not another person dies in this book. In response to Menachem’s
question as to why the actual war of Midian is placed after the census,
it seems that the Torah is stating from the outset, that there will be
no more deaths from this point on (see Hizkuni and Bechor Shor). In (31,
49) the leaders report that they have counted all the Israelites and not
one is missing.
This is not simply the last in a series of plagues.
G-d has decided not to plague them anymore. How do we know this is true?
Is there a test case? I believe there are several. A) As we said, not a
one perished in the Midian war. B) Just as Moshe was mad at the leaders
of the army, so could G-d have intervened. Moshe tried to handle the
Korach rebellion somewhat autonomously and yet G-d intervened. C) When
Moshe became angry at the tribes of Reuven and Gad for their request to
remain, G-d could have intervened but didn’t. We also see here the
communication between Moshe and the people, including the leaders,
improving. Moshe is successful in dealing with them. Pinechas effected a
change not only in G-d’s relationship to the Jews but the Jews’
relations with G-d and Moshe. D) In another civil debate between the
leaders of Menashe and Moshe regarding the daughters of Zelaphchad, a
challenge is brought to Moshe, and he adjudicates it, as he did with the
daughters to begin with (E) and as he had before the book deteriorated
earlier in chapter 9 (v. 6) when people complained about missing the
Paschal sacrifice. On this note of the successful resolution of a
legitimate legal dispute, the book ends. The people complained appropriately,
Moshe responded in a measured fashion, and G-d did not "need"
to intervene. The health of society has been restored. The book is now
complete.
Rabbi Joel M. Finkelstein
Anshei Sphard-Beth El Emeth Congregation, Memphis, TN